Small Business Victory on EPA rule
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency will revise storm water rules
EPA’s effluent limitation guidelines are part of the agency’s efforts to reduce water pollution caused by storm water draining from construction sites. EPA’s proposal was been in the works for over eight years. Litigation on EPA’s stormwater rules by the Natural Resources Defense Council resulted in a court order for the agency to issue its final effluent limitation guidelines by December of last year. EPA’s cost estimates for its final rule were ten times lower than the $10 billion estimated cost of compliance projected by SBA’s Office of Advocacy. Both the National Association of Home Builders and SBA’s Office of Advocacy petitioned the agency in April to revise its rule because EPA severely under-estimated the rule’s impact on small entities. The U.S. Department of Justice agreed with the petitioners and has requested that EPA lower the burden on small business by revising its rule.
Analysis for SBCRR Subscribers
EPA will be under a tight deadline to revise its rule. EPA will rely on small business stakeholders to provide constructive suggestions for preserving the rule’s objectives while lowering the numeric limit on the amount of sediment that can cloud storm water discharges from constructions sites.
Key Documents
- SBA Office of Advocacy press release on victory: click here
- SBA Office of Advocacy petition (April 20, 2010): click here
- News article on EPA’s Storm Water Rules: click here
New Chief Counsel for Advocacy
Winslow Sargeant on board as head of SBA’s Office of Advocacy
On Thursday, August 19, President Obama appointed Winslow Sargeant as the Sixth Chief Counsel for Advocacy at the U.S. Small Business Administration. The new Chief Counsel will be moving from Wisconsin to Washington to take on his new responsibilities. Winslow was the program manager for the Small Business Innovations Research (SBIR) program in Electronics at the National Science Foundation from 2001-2005. Since that time, Winslow has been involved with several entrepreneurial ventures and has collaborated with universities and small businesses in the technology transfer arena.
Key Documents
- White House News Release on Winslow Sargeant’s appointment: click here
- OpEd on Winslow Sargeant’s appointment: click here
SYMPOSIUM SEPTEMBER 21
Learn about the Regulatory Flexibility Act and how the Office of Advocacy can help
SBA’s Office of Advocacy is convening a symposium to highlight the Regulatory Flexibility Act on September 21st at Washington, DC’s Metro Center Marriott (775 12th Street, NW). The symposium is an opportunity to learn more about how the Regulatory Flexibility Act and the Office of Advocacy can help small business. The day-long event will feature panels of experts who will outline various aspects of the law in a how-to format intended to benefit small business stakeholders. Register at: http://www.sba.gov/advo/rfa@30_registration.html
About SBCRR
The Small Business Coalition for Regulatory Relief (SBCRR) is a coalition made up of small businesses and supporting organizations that are interested in federal regulatory developments. SBCRR provides coalition members with regular updates on regulatory proposals and opportunities for small business to provide input that can positively impact final agency decisions.
SBCRR Subscribers receive information and analysis in advance of the newsletter's web-posting. Additionally, subscribers receive analysis on regulatory proposals, regulatory alerts, and information tailored to their membership or interests. For more information on the cost and availability of an SBCRR subscription, please click here or contact Tom.Sullivan@nelsonmullins.com.
Contact:
Tom Sullivan
202.545.2909
tom.sullivan@nelsonmullins.com
Become a fan of SBCRR on Facebook!
Click here to check out our page.
Please make sure to “Like” the page, so our news updates appear on your Facebook news feed.
The articles published in this newsletter are intended only to provide general information on the subjects covered. The contents should not be construed as legal advice or a legal opinion. Readers should consult with legal counsel to obtain specific legal advice based on particular situations.
