May 18, 2023
On May 3, 2023, the South Carolina General Assembly passed S.164 which overhauled the state’s Certificate of Need (CON) law. The bill was signed by Governor McMaster on May 16, 2023 and is now in effect.
S.164 renames the State Certification of Need and Health Facility Licensure Act to the State Health Facility Licensure Act (the “Act”). As the new name implies, the need for a CON is removed for almost all healthcare facilities in South Carolina – except for nursing homes and hospitals.
1. Nursing Homes.The Act still requires a CON for nursing homes before:
2. Hospitals.
3. Ambulatory Surgery Centers. The Act also adds several additional licensing requirements for Ambulatory Surgery Centers. Specifically, any ASC not requiring a CON after the effective date of the Act, must:
4. Exemptions.The Act provides for exemptions to Certificate of Need review from DHEC.
Similar to prior law, the Act requires that a person seeking an exemption must obtain a written exemption from DHEC prior to undertaking a project that could qualify for exemption. This may be more fully described in regulation. The exemptions from the CON requirements are as follows:
5. Project Review Criteria. The Act keeps Section 44-7-190(A) and (B) in place regarding the project review criteria used during the Certificate of Need review process.
However, it adds a provision with additional considerations that “[p]roject review criteria must prioritize timely access to healthcare services and seek a balance between competition in the marketplace and regulation in the provision of healthcare and must support reasonable patient choice in healthcare facilities and services.” The provision requires DHEC to promulgate regulations within one year identifying how it will incorporate these considerations in reviewing Certificate of Need applications.
6. New Deadlines & Time Periods. The Act provides for several new shorter deadlines and time periods for DHEC and CON applicants.
The Act condenses the thirty (30) day deadlines during the CON review process under S.C. Code Ann. Section 44-7-200(D). Specifically, the time period for when DHEC may request additional information regarding a CON application has been reduced from thirty (30) to fifteen (15) days, and a CON applicant now has fifteen (15) days instead of thirty (30) to submit that additional information to DHEC. This change is notable as an applicant who fails to respond within fifteen (15) days instead of thirty (30) days will have its application considered withdrawn.
The Act also keeps in place the requirement that DHEC may not make a decision to approve or deny a CON application earlier than thirty calendar days; however, it reduces the time DHEC staff has to approve or deny a CON application from one hundred twenty (120) to ninety (90) calendar days from the date affected persons are notified that the application is complete, unless a public hearing is timely requested as may be provided for by department regulation.
If a public hearing is requested, the Act reduces the amount of time DHEC has to issue a decision from one hundred fifty (150) to one hundred twenty (120) calendar days from the date affected persons are notified that the application is complete.
7. Discovery Limitations. The Act also places new limitations on discovery in Certificate of Need contested cases:
8. Appeals. The Act now provides that an affected person who was a party to a Certificate of Need contested case has the right to appeal directly to the South Carolina Supreme Court instead of the South Carolina Court of Appeals.
9. Attorney’s Fees and Costs Incurred. The Act adds new provisions whereby a party that does not prevail at the Administrative Law Court level or on appeal to the South Carolina Supreme Court will be required to pay reasonable attorney’s fees and costs incurred.
Specifically, the Act provides that if a party that does not prevail in a contested case at the Administrative Law Court when requesting reversal of DHEC’s decision regarding a CON application, when claiming an exemption under Section 44-7-210, or when claiming non-applicability pursuant to Section 44-7-160, the Administrative Law Court shall now award the party whose project is the subject of the appeal reasonable attorney’s fees and costs incurred in the contested case.
If a party does not prevail in an appeal to the Supreme Court when requesting the reversal of the Administrative Law Court’s decision concerning a Certificate of Need application, when claiming an exemption under Section 44-7-170, or when claiming that the article is not applicable pursuant to Section 44-7-160, the Supreme Court shall award the party whose project is the subject of the contested case reasonable attorney’s fees and costs incurred in the appeal.
However, there is an exception whereby the court must not assess attorney’s fees or costs awarded against or to DHEC in any contested case or appeal involving a Certificate of Need application or an exemption request pursuant to Section 44-7-170 or a request for a determination as to the applicability of Section 44-7-160.
Lastly, the provisions regarding frivolous contested cases or a subsequent appeal have been amended to change the definition of “frivolous appeal”. The Act now defines “frivolous appeal” to mean:
A reasonable person in the same circumstances would believe that:
10. The Certificate of Need Study Committee.
Given these changes, the Act also creates a six-member Certificate of Need Study committee to examine the effect of the repeal of the Certificate of Need program on the quality and quantity of access to healthcare in rural parts of South Carolina. The committee will prepare a report with its work, findings, and any recommendations, including legislative, regulatory, or policy changes by January 1, 2024.
These materials have been prepared for informational purposes only and are not legal advice. This information is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Internet subscribers and online readers should not act upon this information without seeking professional counsel.